Radiocarbon dating age limits - glassob.info
Recent changes detected on two glaciers at the northern part of James Ross Island, Antarctica. It couldn't be that they depict, you know, snakes. Tons upon tons of top soil and Fertilizer actually have to be brought in to certain areas to allow for farming. But I have watched the debate Schoch was in, listened to what he had to say and what other people have had to say in rebuttal. Love to see it.
Compare, for example, a rural barn-raising and square dance. People have tons of time and how they use that time has a multitude of factors. Once the ice core has melted, there will be little geomorphological expression of the moraine. One engineer simply said, "what is the point of all this perfection, it's just not needed. It took two specialized rigs, a bunch of equipment and a specific route so the weight would not damage the roads.
Who Built the Great Pyramid? The glaciers previously were thicker, more extensive and had a convex long-profile. No one questions the legitimacy of the great societies such as Rome. Suddenly evidence is transactional, applicable only when it supports your crazy theories. I just wonder how much energy someone need to pass one small bump on the road to move these gigantic blocks. The stone circles do not exist in isolation. Svalbard polythermal glaciers, in Glacier LandsystemsD. These factors would imply a modern negative mass balance. The glacier ice exposed in the moraine radiocarbon dating age limits interpreted as basal theatre online dating ice formed by adfreezing near the glacial margin. The concept of it being a modified much earlier monument doesn't seem that crazy, however the idea it was carved by anyone other than simple hunter gatherers just starting to learn how to settle is too far fetched-- no way was there some massive lost civilisation preceding Egypt. These explanations sound like Christmas stories to laymen and that is fact. Intial sourcing within or at the end of the article would've been helpful but I'm not your professor so I'm not giving out grades haha. Subglacial and englacial thrusting has therefore entrained sediment, which melts out at the surface to bury single dating events ice core and produce the present-day surface sediment veneer. Journal of the Geological Society, London If I found an island with huge statues damn right I'd take credit for making them too! Go do some homework and wise up There are definitely questions and the reason for this is simple, no one with any common sense can swallow the BS that the establishment is dishing. Carbon dating hasnt been done on the base of the newly dug out moai. So you're writing up a page long blog article on a scientific study without using any reference? Geological Society of London, radiocarbon dating age limits, Special Publication: Any geologist with a vested interest in egyptology has responded to Schoch claim. We therefore conclude that these moraines record the advance of polythermal glaciers, because the englacial and proglacial thrusting and stacking and thick deformed basal ice is indicative of a compressive regime near the snout of the glacier[11, 12, 15]. Go to top or jump to Dating Glacial Sediments. There isn't enough dirt flying around the tiny island that would explain the amount of sediment that has built up to bury the moai. Also your article sounds super pretentious. The pattern is least pronounced on IJR I'd just like to go on the record and say this entire blog is nonsensical and filled with circular logic. Your comment about theories also show the lack of basic understanding about science. Their argument essentially amounted to, he and the geologists cannot be right The orientation of the thrusting closely mirrors the angle of dip and dip direction observed in the stratified glacier ice in the moraines; this closely controls moraine morphology and surface slopes, and also moraine height, width and character. Schoch makes very large attempts to dismiss major findings from other educated scholars with degrees without citing much evidence. It also offers a tantalizing and not illogical idea that civilization may have occurred at certain points in the ancient past. This would produce mean snout recession rates of 0. This may explain the lack of other prominent moraines on Ulu Peninsula.
I find this very interesting. Regardless of right and wrong I am so glad that Schoch is an agitation Certainly there are questions posed by interested parties. It's all about fringe opinions based on years of education. Not everyone steps into this type of opinion based archaeology. When I say opinion you know I mean just filling in the blanks.
So much passion money? I really enjoy all of it. BTW there are still many unanswered questions. Your comment that Schoch's theory about the age of the Sphinx is not supported by other geologists, is incorrect. Watch the original TV show where that theory was put forward. Note the debate between geologists and archeologists, radiocarbon dating age limits.
All the geologists agreed with Schoch on the merits of his scientific and geological argument. The Archeologists were the one's that did not agree. Their argument essentially amounted to, he and the geologists cannot be right Yeah, that's really scientific. The state of the argument in the early s is not the state of the argument today.
Schoch made geological arguments that seemed logical at the time but were disproved by further research. Proof is more convincing to the readers than simply making a blanket statement in an article. August Matthusen among others discussed the flaws in Schoch's research back in the early s: Any geologist with a vested interest in egyptology has responded to Schoch claim.
For the recorded it's been a noted feature of the monument since the 's and not a something Schoch discovered nor claimed to. Rebuttals go both ways, including the relevant returns from Schoch. Just look at wiki to name the most relevant ones.
The scientific method still shows the current dating of the Sphinx to clearly be incorrect and the vast majority of geologists outside of egyptology, which simply means anyone qualified enough without the obvious bias that egyptology will have on the topic, agrees with Scholcs findings.
Those that do not agree are a very small pocket. The article you have written has clearly demonstrated your inability to accept that academia is not always the truth. It's just what the establishment is telling us what they think the truth is at this moment in time. When a scientist offers an alternative, surely we should consider it without any judgement until it is completely and utterly disproved. In Schoch's work we can see there is something that needs looking into. It may have some flaws in its wackiness but there are some leads.
New discoveries are being found all over our planet and they are all pointing to the questions we need to ask about ancient knowledge and the civilisations that preceded ours. We need to open the door and look inside not lock it up and disregard. I understand there is an establishment in place, fearful of the consequences resulting from a new order, but the truth has to be known.
When I saw the pilars at Gobekli Tepe and the hands I immediately saw the connection to the Moai and also the artifacts from the site that are in the Gobekli Tepe museum. I've nevver heard of Schoch, but there is definitely a similarity with these places that is very vietnam dating scams and clear to see.
And the theories about the Giza Pyramids and the age of the Sphinx is all very logical and credible and is alot more logical to see and believe than the Egyptology theory. But science will never accept it mountain biking dating it will question the theory of evolution because despite the very clear objective evidence around the world of intelligent humans many thousands of years ago, it doesn't sit with Darwin's timeline of events.
There was an ice age so maybe telescoped had been developed but the lenses were made from polished ice. It's just a theory that would dating buzz jhb why no lenses found but to be honest I think the oceans washed almost everything away.
There isn't enough dirt flying around the tiny island that would explain the amount of sediment that has built up to bury the moai. Carbon dating hasnt been done on the base of the newly dug out moai. Also a huge flaw with any type of carbon dating is that it does not date the stone, radiocarbon dating age limits.
If I found an island with huge statues damn right I'd take credit for making them too! Actually, geologists by and large have radiocarbon dating age limits problem with Schoch's theory of water erosion on the Sphinx. It wasn't accepted by Egyptologists, geologists will tell you it's fairly obvious, it's not even that difficult to identify, so the idea that it's still not given its due is a little mystifying. And why do people have no problem accepting that Gobekli Tepe was built by hunter gatherers, but then scoff at the idea that hunter gatherer societies were not sophisticated enough to build any other great sites from antiquity?
If they could build Gobekli Tepe then the sky was the limit so speak, to suggest that a base of such knowledge was simply forgotten for seven thousand years until the pyramids came along is a pretty big assumption. The very presence of Gobekli Tepe ought to throw great doubt upon the theory that hunter gatherers were simple and unsophisticated, clearly that was not the case.
The foundation of this level of knowledge could not have appeared completely out of nowhere, it represents a history, a legacy of sacred and profound information. Therefore logic would dictate that hunter gatherers, at least certain populations of them, were aware of this history of sacred knowledge. It also offers a tantalizing and not illogical idea that civilization may have occurred at certain points in the ancient past.
It is only the modern paradigm that says that ancient peoples were ignorant, the evidence of erosion on the Sphinx clearly demonstrates that whoever built it was highly sophisticated, and if that happens to coincide with a time of Hunter gatherers, then it suggests that the modern paradigm is now out of date. In order for the Sphinx to be so heavily eroded it would have had to be built at least about 10 thousand years ago, but it may be even older, the evidence suggests the latter and not the former, don't forget that the particular region it sits in has been dry for thousands of years.
It's a case of evidence vs belief, time for evidence to matter again. Jean Piere Houdin described the errosion around the sphynx and how it occured during conventionally believed timelines quite well.
Really worth a read. Love to see it. I'm not gonna say I'm well versed in any of this, because Dating cp not. But I have watched the debate Schoch was in, listened to what he had to say and what other people have had to say in rebuttal.
So far what I see is that the only reason the sphinx date was set to what it is was because of one piece of graffiti on one stone of the sphinx. So with the actual evidence of water erosion combined with the other couple things Schoch has put forth, it seems pretty clear the original date is wrong.
Who knows if schoch has the right idea of when or how, but at the very least he's proven the original date was incorrect. Also your article sounds super pretentious. Stop being a douche, redacting the sphinx isn't a personal attack on you. Quit being a little bitch. I greatly admire Dr.
Schoch for his original creative thought. My questions are of Physics. Would not sand blown by wind show eddies and currents similar to sand carried by flowing water?
If so, couldn't such movement of air and sand have eroding effects similar to those of sand and flowing water? One more thing, there is evidence of earlier development in Egypt, the problem is that a lot of it happens to be at or near the same site, the underground chamber at the radiocarbon dating age limits Pyramid, the Osirion, and of course the Sphinx itself.
And do not forget Nabta Plya forgive the spelling, it's lateevidence of sophisticated astronomical alignments shown in those formations seem to suggest that the ancient Egyptians spent thousands of years learning new ways to express this sacred science. It's fascinating how the knowledge appears to predate civilization, and that could mean that hunter gatherers radiocarbon dating age limits this knowledge, or inherited it from an even more ancient civilization, one far beyond even the most extreme suggestions of Schoch.
He's really quite conservative in his dating sites argentina, John Anthony West goes much further back, but not beyond what the ancient Egyptians said of themselves.
The evidence to support a significant 'hole' in our understanding of ancient history is, thanks to the likes of Robert Schoch, Christopher Dunn and others quite overwhelming. I find it quite astonishing when there is unequivocal evidence that construction of many of the megaliths, the great Pyramids in particular, granite boxes in the Serapium and many more examples demonstrate a skill completely impossible even 50 years ago and in some cases possibly beyond modern facilities. This being the obvious case then there is a problem with our understanding of some distant historical periods and a new consideration of the ancient past needs to be open minded and take into account many of the 'coincidental' similarities and artefacts from around the world.
Why there seems to be such a reluctance for established ideas and those who hold them to admit the current speed dating san gabriel valley have problems is crazy, for example why do we still hear that the great pyramid was a tomb with a King and Queens chamber, when clearly whatever the pyramid was designed and constructed for it wasn't a tomb.
For example does it look like a tomb or any other confirmed tomb? Was a mummy ever found in there, are there any wall paintings or similar or unequivocal records of its construction as a tomb? Does it make sense as a tomb etc etc? I wish the establishment would simply admit the problem, speak to engineers in regard to skill levels needed both from a design, mathematics, measurement and construction and project management to achieve some of these things and then reconsider what we are being told our hunter gathers were really capable of.
Grim Black Man - where does John mention anything about aliens? It looks like you are grasping the thorns of Hawass style Egyptology a little too tightly. John seems right to me. Above is an example that shows a single man using basic concepts to ny comic con speed dating large objects.
No one questions the legitimacy of the great societies such as Rome. If you also remember from history class, the fall of Rome is a prime example of sophisticated technology being lost. Human history shows a cycle of upward and downward cycles of knowledge.
To think that humans today are more sophisticated and capable than other civilizations is ridiculous. If anything, they were more brilliant to be capable of such feets with less available resources ie.
Your comment about theories also show the lack of basic understanding about science. Theories in science are highly supported through research and evidence to support it. There is definitely always going to be differing opinions, but some "opinions" have more weight than others which is why it is important for scientists to show evidence.
Well said that man complete denial is I think the term your looking for they won't budge thought they will keep the bs rolling till there's nobody's listening. Schoch is much better qualified than you are to begin with, he is not an undergrad. So you're writing up a page long blog article on a scientific study without using any reference?
Theories in science are highly supported through research and evidence to support it. Structural styles and deformation fields in glaciers: For the recorded it's been a noted feature of the monument since the 's and not a something Schoch discovered nor claimed to. He's really quite conservative in his analysis, John Anthony West goes much further back, but not beyond what the ancient Egyptians said of themselves. Chronology of the Palmer Deep site, Antarctic Peninsula: One more thing, there is evidence of earlier development in Egypt, the problem is that a lot of it happens to be at or near the same site, the underground chamber at the great Pyramid, the Osirion, and of course the Sphinx itself. It's fascinating how the knowledge appears to predate civilization, and that could mean that hunter gatherers invented this knowledge, or inherited it from an even more ancient civilization, radiocarbon dating age limits, one far beyond even the most extreme suggestions of Schoch. Schoch made geological arguments that seemed logical at the time but were disproved by further research. Motivation enough for the survivors to attempt such massive constructs and to encode in them what knowlege they believed was indispensable to india online dating posterity. And any workable metal would have been, and still is, a highly coveted material which would have been recycled and re-purposed. The stone circles do not exist in isolation. Does it make sense as a tomb etc etc? Land-terminating mountain glacier on James Ross Island with prominent ice-cored moraines. What a classic case of burying one's head in the proverbial sand. Go do some homework and wise up Rebuttals go both ways, including the relevant returns from Schoch. I greatly admire Dr. When I saw the pilars at Gobekli Tepe and the hands I immediately saw the connection to the Moai and also the artifacts from the site that are in the Gobekli Tepe museum. Take the Serapeum in Saqqara Egypt. There is this individual named Frederich Moss who created a scale, which rates the hardness level of natural materials. It is only the modern paradigm that says that ancient peoples were ignorant, the evidence of erosion on the Sphinx clearly demonstrates that whoever built it was highly sophisticated, and if that happens to coincide with a time of Hunter gatherers, then it suggests that the modern paradigm is now out of date. Just look at wiki to name the most relevant ones. Land-terminating glaciers on James Ross Island are now cooler despite a warmer climate. It's human nature to want to know what's over the radiocarbon dating age limits hill BT. The evidence is undeniable, Dr Schoch dating of the sphinx raises questions which seem to superseed both your archaeoogical and geological expertise, after what could we expect from a journalist? By the way our education,media,economic institutions and system and politicians are owned and controlled by a psycopathic elite whose desire and intent is to keep us in ignorance Late Holocene changes in character and behaviour of land-terminating glaciers on James Ross Island, Antarctica. They confuse us and are enigmatic at best. These rates are much lower than those calculated for the glaciers of James Ross Island from onwards[2, 23]. Once the ice core has melted, there will be little geomorphological expression of the moraine. Author I'm an author and editor who has published on a range of topics, including archaeology, science, and horror fiction. This dogma does not allow for the idea of societal boom and bust as man kind navigates his way through planetary disasters